Saudi Arabia’s digital rights hypocrisy

462036 0

The intersection of human rights and digital rights has become increasingly critical as digital technologies permeate every aspect of modern life. The United Nations (UN) has been proactive in addressing digital rights and cyber law through a range of resolutions, reports, and frameworks aimed at shaping international norms and encouraging member states to align their policies with these principles. Despite these efforts, Saudi Arabia presents a stark contrast to the UN’s vision of digital rights. The Kingdom has not ratified many of the critical international human rights treaties; this reluctance becomes particularly contentious in the context of Saudi Arabia hosting the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) at the end of this year. The IGF, a UN initiative, is designed to facilitate multistakeholder discussions on public policy issues related to the internet. Hosting such an event in Saudi Arabia, a country known for its severe restrictions on political freedoms, freedom of expression, and internet censorship, raises significant concerns about the commitment to the principles the IGF aims to uphold.

This paper delves into Saudi Arabia’s human rights record, focusing on its extensive digital rights abuses. It further explores specific cases of digital rights violations, illustrating the Kingdom’s pervasive surveillance and censorship infrastructure. Moreover, it critiques the involvement of Western nations and corporations, whose economic and strategic interests often overshadow human rights considerations, thereby enabling the continuation of these abuses.

The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the implications of Saudi Arabia hosting the IGF, highlighting the inconsistencies and challenges in promoting digital rights in a repressive environment.

Conclusion: 

Saudi Arabia’s hosting of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) highlights the country’s hypocrisy regarding digital rights and human rights. The IGF, a United Nations initiative, aims to promote open and inclusive dialogue on public policy issues related to the internet, emphasising the importance of human rights in the digital age. However, Saudi Arabia’s record in this domain is marred by extensive violations, including severe restrictions on freedom of expression, pervasive surveillance, and systematic censorship. Saudi Arabia’s investment in advanced surveillance technologies and its collaboration with international technology companies further entrench its capacity to monitor, censor, and suppress dissent. Projects like NEOM epitomise this surveillance culture, raising significant concerns about privacy and digital rights. The involvement of Western corporations and governments in these initiatives underscores a troubling complicity, prioritising economic and strategic interests over the upholding of fundamental human rights.

By hosting the IGF, Saudi Arabia projects an image of commitment to digital innovation and global dialogue on internet governance. However, this facade masks a reality of systematic human rights abuses and digital rights violations. The Kingdom’s participation in such an international forum should serve as a reminder of the urgent need for genuine reforms and accountability. The international community must not overlook these contradictions and should continue to press for substantive changes that align with the principles and values the IGF represents.

The decision to award the hosting of the IGF to Saudi Arabia is a reminder of the complexities and contradictions in the global landscape of digital and human rights. It is a call to action for all stakeholders to ensure that the fundamental principles of human rights are upheld, not just in rhetoric but in practice, adhering to the United Nation’s Universal Declaration on Human Rights.

 

Press below to download the briefing paper

SAUDI DIGITAL RIGHTS BRIEFING PAPER.docx